The Align360 clone scored 91.9% (GREEN) across 27 test scenarios. It's ready for alpha — but the tester flagged 6 items that need your human eye before going live.
This interactive form walks you through each item. Your answers get published as a report and sent to Jason automatically.
The clone was tested against 27 scenarios. The tester identified 5 questions for you where a human answer would sharpen the clone's accuracy. Even a short reply or voice-note transcription is perfect.
Read each question. Reply with your honest answer — 2-3 sentences is plenty. Don't overthink it. These answers will be integrated directly into the clone.
When someone says "I'm exhausted, nothing is working" — the clone responds with: "those built something in you that you can't see yet." Does that sound like you? Would you use more specific language about what rejection builds?
When you refuse to decide for someone, how do you frame the WHY? The clone says: "no one else can carry the weight of a decision that only you have to live with." Is that your actual reasoning, or would you frame it differently (faith, agency, ownership)?
When someone says they hate their career but can't leave it, the clone reframes their experience as "a foundation, not wasted." Is this the right weight? Would you lean harder into "gifts of rejection" or is "foundation" more appropriate?
When adapting for secular audiences, the clone reframes "Redemptive Gifts" as "natural strengths profile" and "how you're naturally built." Are these the terms you prefer? Are there others you'd use instead?
The clone modulates between four energy states: High (momentum), Medium (steady guidance), Low (reflective/rest), and Crisis (slow/grounded/stabilizing). Do the levels feel right? Are there transitions the clone should handle differently?
These 5 questions are about product decisions and platform features. Short answers are perfect.
When users ask about the B3 neuroscience tool, the clone says it's "in development" and redirects to Orientation for Impact as a bridge. Is there approved language for partner tool inquiries? Is the redirect correct?
Community/fellowship is the weakest scoring dimension (7.0/10). This is because no community features exist on the platform yet. Is this acceptable at launch, or should the clone plant more community seeds even without platform features?
The Wiring for Impact opening question is functional but not deeply narrative. Is the v6.1 prompt template the approved opening, or can we enrich it with a narrative frame like: "The way you naturally respond when things get messy tells us something about how you're designed..."
When users want multiple tools, the clone suggests Resume Analyzer before LinkedIn Optimizer because "resume narrative informs LinkedIn." Is this the approved sequencing, or should users choose freely?
We tested 27 scenarios across 5 categories. Are there user scenarios from alpha testing or previous feedback that aren't covered? Any specific situations the team has encountered?
The clone scored 9.78/10 on crisis response. But the exact phrasing needs your blessing — this is the voice users hear at their lowest moments.
Read this out loud. Does it sound like you?
Some alpha users won't share a faith background. The clone needs approved alternative language so it works for everyone.
When the user doesn't use faith language, the clone currently says "natural strengths profile" instead of "Redemptive Gifts" and "how you're naturally built" instead of "how God wired you."
| Faith-Based Term | Current Secular Alt | Your Preference |
|---|---|---|
| Redemptive Gifts | Natural Strengths Profile | |
| How God wired you | How you're naturally built | |
| Your gift | Your wiring type | |
| Spiritual gifting | Core design pattern | |
| Created with purpose | Built with intention | |
| Biblical foundation | Foundational framework |
Should the clone default to secular language (and only use faith language when the user signals it) — or default to faith language and adapt when needed?
Fellowship-Seeded (community orientation) scored 7.0/10 — the weakest dimension. The platform has no community features yet. Pick your approach for alpha launch.
In the March 4 team call, you mentioned creating a character document for the AI persona. The clone currently uses "Align360 Guide" — no character persona. If Mr. Bunny/Mr. JC is how you want the AI to present, we need details.
Is Mr. Bunny / Mr. JC needed for alpha? If not, just hit "Defer" and you're done with this section.
The clone knows published pricing ($178/yr OPTIMIZED, $298/yr FULL STACK) but alpha pricing for the first 5 users is not set. Will said in the March 6 call: "Do we know what we're gonna charge? No."
The clone estimates "$5K-$50K+ range" for premium coaching. Samuel — confirm actual price points:
| CBI Offer | Current Estimate | Actual Price |
|---|---|---|
| Execution Jumpstart (6-week) | $5K-$50K+ | |
| Crowned Coaching Core (12-week) | $5K-$50K+ | |
| Vision-to-Execution (6-mo) | $5K-$50K+ | |
| Rejection Series Mastermind | Not disclosed | |
| Disruptive Advantage Mastermind | Not disclosed |
Check everything looks right. Click "Edit" on any section to go back and change it.
Publishing your report and notifying Jason...